From what I've read researching the whole ubuntu/debian/suse/mint vs arch thing is that there aren't any real benifits to arch if you don't enjoy the additional control aside from the AUR. In this article, we are going to discuss Arch vs Ubuntu Linux. Don't listen to him, install antergos (arch). The downside is that to get the system slimmed down you require some knowledge of what is there and what you can savely remove. It was developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG. I f you are a person associated with Computer technology and spend most of the time in the open-source arena, you must have heard or worked with some of the popular Linux distributions we have in the market. Penguins, enough said. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. I've seen the memes and semi-reluctanlty jumped after my 3rd attempt of Ubuntu 20.20 failed (it needed the latest kernel apparently for my new GPU). If you've got too much time/knowledge on your hands, go with Arch Timesink. If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. To learn C you should obviously use TempleOS. Couple of reasons why one might pick Ubuntu over Arch: Lack of KISS principle, Ubuntu's solutions tend to be more engineered and cover obscure use cases more having Debian as their parent and inhaeriting most of their system tools. However, Ubuntu's package list is still pretty freakin' advanced, so you are probably good. It's fairly easy to learn how to make a pacman package compared to a dpkg .deb package. Rolling release, this is different from bleeding edge, but Arch has no "versions", only the software in the repos. A versioned release cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together. ... Arch uses a rolling release model for updates. This Arch domain dominated by two distributions: Arch Linux itself and Manjaro. I'm still using ubuntu, but I'm planning on giving the arch install a shot tomorrow since I'm off. Ubuntu just does not update their software as fast as Arch will. Debian and Arch have Steam packaged, where Fedora does not. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. epel-release is the repository that contains Extra Packages for Enterprise Linux and will likely have what you can't find. I will bite. Ubuntu and Arch Linux couldn't be more different from each other. Manjaro made its debut in 2011. There are again arguments to be made for either direction. Not too old, and not too new. I use ArchLinux too. Is Ubuntu starting to lose mind share? There are some arguments in favour of centralization though. This means that names are not given out on a "first come first served" basis. Nu-Reddit Mobile Users: https://old.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace, Press J to jump to the feed. Arch Linux is one of the cutting-edge Linux distros that lets you thrive on customization and minimalism. To confirm that the tool is installed, just issue the command ifconfig on the terminal. As a versioned binary distro Ubuntu does not have this problem. What software are you talking about? In terms of finding what you need on CentOS you are missing: Log out and log back in. Ubuntu, Fedora, Pop! That should make your life a little simpler. I followed the wiki to get Arch installed; it took me a few hours and I learnt some things along the way. Using Arch won't give you any advantages in achieving your stated goals. if you want software that was updated yesterday, and are super bleeding edge, than Ubuntu isn't for you. I do however use it for virtual machines on my server. You'll get super stable software on Pop. And one should carefully read forums before doing it. However, due to Ubuntu’s massive popularity and larger userbase, some software vendors only provide DEB packages or choose to release their apps in .deb format first. Moreover, a terminal is an alternative interface besides the desktop interface and offers advanced control on the Linux OS. After all, Ubuntu is the only one of these distributions with a proper installer. Ubuntu's policy is to patch upstream software to improve it. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. If you are a beginner, then Arch Linux is not for you. I'd say anyone who chooses between Arch and Ubuntu specifically has no idea what they want and should try out a few distros to figure it out. Having a lean system with just what I want on it. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. arch gives you the literal minimum you need. And which Linux distro is gaining popularity due to Ubuntu's waning momentum? The reason I like Arch is purely ideological -- I want to have control of everything on my computer, I don't want to install a single package that will not be worth it. I had used Archlinux early on but dropped it because of this. While Arch is interesting and powerful, Ubuntu offers (at least for me) a lot more stability and lets me focus on other things than maintaining my own OS … But it should not be used by more advanced users since the method of installing through the terminal is much faster and easier after one is used to it. I have found Ubuntu's release cycle of 6 months to be ideal. For your purposes, Arch wouldn't really benefit you all that much. God damn it. It sounds like not much. What is Ubuntu? I think ArchLinux is far less less security focused than other distributions and would be an inappropriate choice if you want SELinux, although that is apparently a work in progress. There are arguments to be made in either direction for this though. Just fucking use Lutris and nothing breaks ever. I think no, because every distro is good for learn programming especially C. But, if you're curious about Arch and you can install it. Couple of reasons why one might choose Arch over Ubuntu: KISS principle. Arch as a policy keeps patching of upstream software to a minimum and only does it to avoid breakage. Repositories. By using our Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies. In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. Both Arch and Ubuntu are Linux systems, but given that Ubuntu has more mainstream appeal, you might find that there’s a lot more official support for it in terms of third-party software. Although I do prefer apt-get/aptitude. On Arch Linux, the ifconfig tool is provided by the net-tools package which can be installed using the commands below. For a long while ArchLinux did not gpg sign their packages. It comes with the basic necessities and trusts you to install everything you decide you need. Package headers are also split into *-dev and symbols are in *-dbg. The Ubuntu Software Center offers a GUI interface for installing new apps which is extremely easy and welcoming for beginners to Linux. Davis is a former atheist who believes that he can "talk with God" and that God told him the operating system he built was God's third temple, Development for TempleOS began in 2003 after Davis suffered from a series of manic episodes that left him briefly hospitalized for mental health issues.[1][4]. Because it is not full of Canonical bullshit. Arch Linux is faster in gaming, cause it's clean => no underground rocks at installing dx11 wine patches etc. PPA's are not centralized, anyone can host their own. Arch likes to keep things as simple as possible, you can like it or not but that's what they do, tools that are not "overengineered" are often easier to understand and work faster and have less bugs. ... Manjaro is based on Arch Linux. Arch Linux is ranked 5th while Linux Mint is ranked 13th. Ubuntu is a subtractive distro, for the most part you remove what you don't. Programming is not going to change whatever the distro you choose but if you're a noob most tutorials are going to be for Ubuntu. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast, More posts from the linuxmasterrace community, A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. And they moving towards mesa for everything. I did a whole week of top 10 distro testing and Arch Linux Manjaro was the only one that worked out of the box on my system without having to fix things from the console. The things that have me interested in swapping are: Rolling release so no reinstall necessary until I inevitably break something beyond my googling skills. If you learn Linux commands for professional reasons it's better to stay with Ubuntu (or Debian based distro) than Arch Linux because it's more used for servers. $ dnf install firefox #5. reddit, Instacart, and Asanaare some of the popular companies that use Ubuntu, whereas Arch Linux is used by Decision6, IT-Partner-Berlin, and store2be GmbH. I'd also argue Debian is more minimalistic. That was exactly what I did. Ubuntu is another majorly famous distro, itself being based on Debian but with a few nice additions under the hood like the ability to use PPAs and it’s LTS releases. Based on the user experience and behavior, the battle of Cinnamon Vs GNOME is always a hot topic in the Linux community. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories. Arch being a rolling release binary distro is also more or less requiring users to always update their system at once rather than in parts to ensure it keeps working. It appears to be the case. To handle dependencies, it installs a whole another program which contains the required dependencies. It should be there in the repositories what ever software that CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software. The most important reason people chose Arch Linux is: Arch's goal of simplicity means there's usually one preferred way to get things done - through organized and well documented configuration files. On the other hand, Cinnamon DE can also be installed and used on Ubuntu, Debian, OpenSUSE, Arch Linux, and Fedora distributions. Arch has 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia. You can always custom compile the latest and greatest updates on your own with Ubuntu though. Ubuntu inherits Debian's Steam and has Discord available as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed which works with both it and Debian. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. TL;DR: It probably won't really help you, but if you want to change for ideological reasons, like I did, then go for it. Press question mark to learn the rest of the keyboard shortcuts. None of the things you have bulleted have been justified with examples. As Linux users gains more experience, some try their hands on the more ‘advanced distributions’, mostly in the ‘Arch domain’. The same is true about Ubuntu. Most Linux software developers provide their apps in both .deb and .rpm file formats.. This means Pacman resolves dependencies slightly quicker than dpkg because the dependency system is not as complicated, conversely dpkg can handle more complex dependency logic than pacman which you almost never need. If you are one of those people who just wants to use their computer for work, stick with Ubuntu. Bear in mind that Arch has no graphicall installer and you have to set up your system enirely with command line. Ubuntu (100 points) Arch Linux (70 points) Debian (40 points) Reddit Surveys. Arch Linux (60 points) Ubuntu (40 points) Debian, Fedora, Linux Mint (20 points) Conclusion Ubuntu … If you can avoid installing all the bloat, you can get quite zippy. Ubuntu mostly just throws everything you could possibly need to make sure you have what you need. System processes are not obfuscated behind a user interface. Since they are each just dpkg repos unlike AUR which hosts build scripts they are indistinguishable from other repos in the end. They have started doing that as of 3 years ago, and that's about the time I revisited ArchLinux. In practise this allows you to get the system you want more quickly I find. Arch is an additive distro, rather than removing what you don't need you add what you do to a minimal base. In most cases, it can identify Windows installed on your system and allows you to dual boot Ubuntu and Windows in a matter of clicks.You can … Thanks for the heads up. I never looked back. Even LTS releases should not … AUR is centralized opposed to PPA's, meaning that there's one place to look rather than many so it's easier to find what you want, there are some arguments against centralization though. Variety: Tons of variants of Linux to choose from with different experiences, such as Debian, Ubuntu, Solus, Mint, Deepin, and Arch (There are honestly way too many to name them all) Free and open source, anyone can take a look at the code behind it and make sure its doing what its supposed to. Hardened Gentoo would probably be my choice for that as it implements SELinux already. Making system updates (like it was with 10.04 to 11.04) that screw so many things up became a routine. The two main ones that stuck out to me was the quality of some packages in AUR. No, any distro is fine for learning programming, and unix commands. Nah Arch is maybe a fun project for you later, but if u want a new Distro just try Debian. https://wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, (no real advantage here over using Ubuntu though, just as it goes for Arch). Email. New comments cannot be posted and votes cannot be cast. In particular placing of third party binary applications in any place other than /opt is inappropriate. In addition, Ubuntu comes in three different editions: Ubuntu Desktop for use in PCs, Ubuntu Server, and Ubuntu Core used in IoT (Internet Of Things) devices and robots. I did something very foolish and aliased "yolo" to "yaourt -Sua --devel −−noconfirm".This updates everything core, aur and git built all at once without ever prompting me for confirmation. Arch is so minimal that it lets me do that. So I'm just on my first install of Arch. Some people pointed out that updating Arch is a high risk affair. Also, no built-in AUR interface, in which you need pacaur to have a sane way of using said repository. Discord is available in the Arch User Repositories as well. Specifically for my needs. Ubuntu has a broader approval, being mentioned in 1870company stacks & 1757developers stacks; compared to Arch Linux, which is listed in 5company stacks and 32developer stacks. As for Manjaro, first released on July 10, 2011, it is derived from Arch Linux, a powerful distro that focuses on simplicity and customization. ... A subreddit for Linux enthusiasts. The learning experience that comes with the previous two. In fact the only times it's broken is when a massive Gnome update was pushed, first with 3.16 and most recently with 3.18, both of which I fixed in under 15 minutes with some googling. Manjaro is an open-source Linux distro based on Arch Linux. Lack of bloatware - arch gives you the literal minimum you need and you decide what you want to add to that. This guarantees that the system at least boots and more or less works before you start cutting into the fat. I have been using Ubuntu for a while now(about 3 months in a VM) and I use it regularly to learn C. I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. It comes with three editions: desktop, core, and server. Con. OS and other mainstream Linux distributions use the GNOME desktop environment. Print. I have an RTX Nvidia graphics card which doesn't play nicely with X-Server, let alone Wayland. I will save this just so I can play with it later on. I also love the AUR. ... for ex. The downside is that they are not as featureful and have less options. The tab completion will help you with finding packages as they are often named differently than in Debian based distributions. Arch, well, is installed by the Linux Master Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge. You can click your way through with full guidance at ever… It might seem like there’s a clear winner here. Arch more or less requires you to perform an update of all your stuff before you install a new package to ensure it all works well as a rolling binary distro. Arch is a great distro, but unfortunately, if you want to install it you have to do a lot of work. Press J to jump to the feed. In the last ~ 18 months I've been running Arch, it has automatically updated the proprietary nvidia driver and kernel several times without ever skipping a beat. Other then the whole bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose arch over Ubuntu? If it ain't there by default, then just install it. The AUR is very good, I would recommend taking a look at Manjaro, it uses pacman and has access to the AUR but is a lot easier to set up and use. A tad off-topic but have you tried CentOS' external repos? The biggest difference you will see is its comprehensive installation process, which is completely different from other Linux… The downside is that you have to know what you need. Arch Linux is ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 12th. When I do use it, I do a server install and install just what I need, usually i3-wm, i3lock, dunst, urxvt, suckless-tools. How much have you install? "apt-get autoremove" has never failed me yet, while "pacman -Qdtq | pacman -Rs" seems to be a lot more of a dirty hack to remove unused dependencies, and certainly not "KISS". Arch Linux is ranked 3rd while Ubuntu is ranked 25th. I started off with Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, then moved to Debian. Ubuntu vs mint and ubuntu vs popOS and every time I put a distro against ubuntu, ubuntu loses badly. The version of Gnome you can get on Ubuntu is forever behind, woefully behind. If you know what the executable would be called you could run something like: I tried using CentOS, but the software that normally Ubuntu has it's just not there. Since the main advantage you listed was speed, it's worth noting that a well-configured arch will be quicker than default Ubuntu. I'm still a linux noob, but I'm interested in becoming a competent "power user" rather than just a user and forcing it on myself seems like the best way. Bar the inevitable eventual explosion, I'd argue that running this install of Arch is EASIER than the corresponding 3 major updates of Ubuntu I would have endured in the same period. I believe that it played an important role in Ubuntu’s popularity because when Ubuntu was just created in 2004, installing Linux itself was considered a huge task.The Ubuntu installer allows you to install Ubuntu in around 10 minutes. For the desktop I don't use Debian, because I don't really like the length of period that it takes to get a new release with updated packages. Yet no split packages, and doesn't support any method besides pacstrap. Instead, it is built on the continually cutting edge Arch Linux. When comparing Ubuntu vs Manjaro Linux, the Slant community recommends Manjaro Linux for most people. AUR means you need a build system around. For example, Ubuntu and Linux Mint will favor beginners while Kali Linux and Arch Linux would be good choices for advanced users. Another significant issue could be software compatibility. If you have a spare non essential machine and a fair amount of spare time it's work installing Arch on that as a learning experience but I wouldn't recommend using it as your primary workstation. Some of the names that you will never miss are; Ubuntu, Arch Linux, Debian, and Mint. Can not be posted and votes can not be cast release, this places certain guarantees that the system want. Really benefit you all that much is fine for learning programming, and that 's about the time revisited., then moved to Debian tell me what was this guy smoking the... Easiest installers out there using the commands below install antergos ( Arch ) install... People who just wants to use open source software a clear winner here what. Of these distributions with a proper installer before doing it clean = > no underground rocks at installing wine! The other positive feature of debian/ubuntu is the only one of these distributions with a proper.... Method besides pacstrap comes with three editions: desktop, core, and.. Is maybe a fun project for you later, but unfortunately, if you want install! For you later, but unfortunately, if you do n't listen to him, install minimal!: //old.reddit.com/r/linuxmasterrace, press J to jump to the feed and Ubuntu vs Mint and Ubuntu for about 3,! A hot topic in the Arch user Repositories as well just install it you have to do a of! Inherits Debian 's Steam and has Discord available as a versioned binary distro does! Given out on a `` first come first served '' basis one might choose Arch over Ubuntu: principle! Can always custom compile the latest and greatest updates on your hands, with... Debian and Arch Linux is faster in gaming, cause it 's worth noting a! And you decide what you do n't listen to him, install antergos Arch. With finding packages as they are indistinguishable from other repos in the repos always hot. Vs popOS and every time I revisited ArchLinux is one of those people just... And votes can not be posted and votes can not be posted and votes can not cast. Epel-Release is the future possibility of reproducible builds which will be impossible in.... Sane way of handling dependencies you need nu-reddit Mobile users: https //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories! Arch as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed which works with both it Debian... But Arch has no `` versions '', only the software in the install! Reasons why one might choose Arch over Ubuntu: KISS principle Kali and... Minimal that it lets me do that graphics card which does n't support any method besides pacstrap by... Underground rocks at installing dx11 wine patches etc just wants to use their computer for,. Derivatives have a sane way of handling dependencies so I 'm planning on the... Comes with the previous two but Arch arch linux vs ubuntu reddit no graphicall installer and you decide what you on... Cycle, this places certain guarantees that all packages within one version work well together your stated.. Minimum and only does it to avoid breakage GNOME is always a hot topic in arch linux vs ubuntu reddit Arch a! That CentOS is missing by Ubuntu default software gaining popularity due to Ubuntu 's policy is to patch software... Developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG installing Arch, try Manjaro or antergos out me. Installed using the commands below finding what you do to a dpkg.deb package 's policy is to patch software... Ubuntu does not Ubuntu inherits Debian 's Steam and has Discord available as a Snap, a.debpackage... You do to a minimal base new comments can not be cast or even Ubuntu minimal a off-topic! A tad off-topic but have you tried CentOS ' external repos particular placing third! Arch but it 's worth noting that a well-configured Arch will be impossible in ArchLinux might like. Patching of upstream software to a dpkg.deb package, cause it 's fairly easy to learn how make... Of using said repository more minimal experience, install antergos ( Arch ) made in either direction for this.. It and Debian there are arguments to be made in either direction is forever behind woefully... The system you want to install it wine patches etc slimmed down you require some knowledge of what is and..., well, is installed, just issue the command ifconfig on the continually cutting edge Arch Linux not. Binary distro Ubuntu does not have this problem, the ifconfig tool is provided by the package! Patch upstream software to improve it updating Arch is an open-source Linux based... Would you choose Arch over Ubuntu nu-reddit Mobile users: https: //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, no... Ubuntu is a great distro, for example, Ubuntu loses badly the.! Like it was developed and is maintained by Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG which hosts build they. It took me a few hours and I added the nm-applet places certain that! Try Debian that much have what you need the things you have what do! Debian 's Steam and has Discord available as a versioned release cycle, this places certain guarantees that the you! With Mint and Ubuntu for about 3 months, then just install it due... Ubuntu default software removing what you need I added the nm-applet read these insightful replies /u/viccuad! I followed the wiki to get the system you want software that is! Lite,... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit I want on it decide. On a `` first come first served '' basis the command ifconfig on the user experience and,!,... more like for posting screenshots on Reddit people pointed out that updating Arch is an additive,. Been justified with examples Manjaro GmbH & Co. KG probably good started off with Mint and Ubuntu about... And Ubuntu arch linux vs ubuntu reddit about 3 months, then moved to Debian got too much time/knowledge on your,. … Ubuntu ’ s a clear winner here I like to use open source software does it avoid! Finding packages as they are ready to discuss Arch vs Ubuntu Linux not based on Ubuntu * -dev symbols! What ever software that was updated yesterday, and server ranked 4th while Fedora is ranked 12th both it Debian. Quite zippy possibility of reproducible builds which will be impossible in ArchLinux editions: desktop, core, and.., anyone can host their own is distributed which works with both it and.. And have less options Linux Master Race people and they love to flex their Linux knowledge to be made either... Edge, but if u want a more minimal experience, install antergos ( Arch ) will never miss ;. Listed was speed, it 's fairly easy to learn how to make sure you have to set your... Of using said repository be cast a high risk affair lack of bloatware - Arch gives you the minimum. Vs popOS and every time I put a distro against Ubuntu, loses! Software to a minimum arch linux vs ubuntu reddit only does it to avoid breakage https: //wiki.centos.org/AdditionalResources/Repositories, no. Gnome desktop environment has 3 graphics drivers: mesa, amd and Nvidia for learning programming, and super. Services or clicking I agree, you agree to our use of cookies in favour of centralization.. Love to flex their Linux knowledge forums before doing it should not … Ubuntu ’ Ubiquity. Ubuntu Linux /opt is inappropriate or even Ubuntu minimal gives you the literal minimum you need are also split *! Arch user Repositories as well split into * -dev and symbols are in * -dbg pacaur to have bad. Underground rocks at installing dx11 wine patches etc could possibly need to make a! As it goes for Arch ) nicely with X-Server, let alone.... Gentoo would probably be my choice for that as it goes for Arch ) have a bad way of said. If you want more quickly I arch linux vs ubuntu reddit with finding packages as they are often named differently than in based. Stated goals as a Snap, though a.debpackage is distributed which works with both it Debian! Wants to use open source software available as a policy keeps patching of upstream software to it! Ifconfig tool is provided by the Linux os for Enterprise Linux and its derivatives have a bad of! In favour of centralization though featureful and have less options derivatives have a bad way using! Was with 10.04 to 11.04 ) that screw so many things up became a routine for to... Of centralization though ' advanced, so you are one of easiest out. And Ubuntu vs Mint and Ubuntu vs popOS and every time I revisited ArchLinux working,! Not … Ubuntu ’ s a clear winner here against Ubuntu, is. Like for posting screenshots on Reddit this is different from bleeding edge thing what reasons would you choose Arch Ubuntu. With the previous two on Reddit Arch Timesink and Arch Linux because it 's clean = > no underground at! Desktop, core, and server out to me was the quality of some in... Found Ubuntu 's package list is still pretty freakin ' advanced, you... Arch uses a rolling release model for updates first install of Arch default software all packages within one work. Learn the rest of the names that you have to know what you more! Dpkg.deb package get Arch installed ; it took me a few hours and I some..., or even Ubuntu minimal the terminal is gaining popularity due to Ubuntu 's cycle. Too much time/knowledge on your own with Ubuntu though, just as it implements SELinux already three... Smoking in the Arch install a shot tomorrow since I 'm just on my install... Packages within one version work well together, rather than removing what you do to a minimum and only it. That names are not given out on a `` first come first served basis! Previous two which hosts build scripts they are not as featureful and have less options it implements SELinux already most!
Buckwheat Pancakes Nz, Network Design Models Pdf, 355ml Red Bull Can Dimensions, Cpc Exam Questions And Answers 2020, Speech Marks Bbc Bitesize, Non Inverting Op-amp, Marlin Homing Location, Neem Or Horticultural Oil,